Our US Senate candidate, Wendy Long, was on the Fred Dicker radio show this AM. You can listen to the pod cast here or read about it here.
Why does Senator Schumer always lead from behind?
For anyone who does not believe that Social Security needs reform, this is a must read. The article indicates that the interest on the principle is not included which would modify the 4% loss on payouts. Interest? Have you looked at what you earn in interest on your savings account? Adding to the Social Security fiscal problems is the fact that baby boomers will be collecting for an average of 20 or more years, then add the fact that Americas birth rate is down for the fourth year in a row, then you will have a better understanding of the urgent need for reform.
First it was VP Biden who unwittingly spoke the truth, now David Axelrod is. This morning on MSNBC he said ""You can't square the circle, and Gov. Romney is going to be held accountable for that." Actually Mr. Axelrod, last night Governor Romney held President Obama accountable for trying to square the circle.
The Heritage Foundation assesses on debate. The Weekly Standard; Larry Kudlow; the Washington Examiner; Jonah Goldberg; the NY Sun; and the NY Post all give Governor Romney kudos.
A very special thank you to Jim Geraghty who writes the Morning Jolt for National Review Online for the great recap of last night's debate or what he calls The Denver Knockout...the quotes are just too good to leave out of today's blog.
Morning Jolt – October 4, 12
By
Jim Geraghty
Here’s
your Thursday Morning Jolt.
Enjoy!
Jim
The Denver Knockout
“I
can't believe I'm saying this, but Obama looks like he DOES need a
teleprompter.”
Guess
who said that?
Chuck
Todd: “Very important night for Mitt Romney. And he rose to the challenge.”
Later in the evening, Todd reported, “[The Obama campaign] knows they lost
tonight.”
Rachel
Maddow began by saying, “I don’t know who won this debate.”
Chris
Matthews was morose: "I don't know what he was doing out there. . . . He
had his head down."
Go
watch the video of the meltdown. It’s worth
it. The transcript doesn’t capture just how epic it was:
"Where
was Obama tonight? He should watch -- well, not just Hardball, Rachel, he
should watch you, he should watch the Reverend Al [Sharpton], he should watch
Lawrence. He would learn something about this debate. There's a hot debate
going on in this country. You know where it's been held? Here on this network
is where we're having the debate," Matthews said.
"We
have our knives out," Matthews said, admitting his network is trying their
best to defend Obama and his policies. "We go after the people and the
facts. What was he doing tonight? He went in their disarmed."
"He
was like, 'Oh an hour and half? I think I can get through this thing. And I
don't even look at this guy.' Whereas Romney -- I love the split-screen --
staring at Obama, addressing him like prey. He did it just right. 'I'm coming
at an incumbent. I got to beat him. You've got to beat the champ and I'm going
to beat him tonight. And I don't care what this guy, the moderator, whatever he
thinks he is because I'm going to ignore him," Matthews said.
"What
was Romney doing?" Matthews asked. "He was winning."
Ed
Schultz, MSNBC: "I was disappointed in the president tonight. . . . He was
off his game. I was stunned."
Michael Moore: “This is what happens when you
pick John Kerry as your debate coach. . . . What's that silence I hear? No one
throwing a party? No one saying this election is a slam dunk for Obama? What
happened to the victory lap?”
Van
Jones: "Up until tonight, we were told Romney was Thurston Howell. . . .
Tonight, he was presidential."
Larry Sabato: “Probably Romney's best debate
ever. Maybe Obama's worst. I lost count of # of opportunities Obama missed. . .
. This debate may build audience for other 3. Voters will want to see if Obama
can stage comeback. . . . Mr. President, cancel all your golf games. You did
miserably tonight.”
Wolf
Blitzer: “This was a pretty good night for Mitt Romney. He clearly held his
own. We didn’t hear the attack lines from President Obama that we were
expecting . . .”
John
King: “A lot of liberals complaining about Obama’s performance. He was rusty.
He hasn’t done this for four years. We didn’t hear about Bain Capital, we
didn’t hear about the 47 percent.”
Anderson
Cooper: “Critics of the president often say he can be professorial, I imagine
they’ll be saying that tonight.”
Terry
Moran: “Obama's passivity in this debate, his lack of oomph and clarity, plays
into the Romney narrative: Nice guy; can't lead. Big W for GOP.”
Nicholas Kristof: “Romney is relaxed and
empathetic, while Obama comes across as a constipated professor. C'mon, Mr.
President!”
David Corn: “Romney looks like he's having a
good time. Obama does not.”
Josh
Greenman of the New York Daily
News: “Possible upside: Some people might feel a little sorry for
Obama?”
Michael
Crowley of Time
magazine: “Sensing weakness, Sasha and Malia just hounded dad into doubling
their allowances.”
I
mention all of these liberals and MSM folks to demonstrate that it wasn’t just
us feeling good about seeing what we wanted to see in Romney. One last one:
“This
was a disaster for the president for the key people he needs to reach, and his
effete, wonkish lectures may have jolted a lot of independents into giving
Romney a second look.
Obama
looked tired, even bored; he kept looking down; he had no crisp statements of
passion or argument; he wasn't there.
He was entirely defensive, which may have been the strategy. But it was the
wrong strategy. At the wrong moment.
The
person with authority on that stage was Romney -- offered it by one of the
lamest moderators ever, and seized with relish. This was Romney the salesman.
And my gut tells me he sold a few voters on a change tonight. It's beyond
depressing. But it's true.”
As
for the folks watching at home . . .
CBS
News instapoll: 46% said Romney won. 22% said Obama won. 32% said tie.
CNN
InstaPoll: 67% say Mitt Romney won, 25% Obama, registered voters who watched
the debate.
Mark Knoller: “Poll shows 56% of uncommitted
voters say their opinion of Romney has changed for the better. 13% say that
about the President.”
Laura
Ingraham: “Obama is not good at debates because Obama is rarely challenged by
anyone on anything.”
Exurban
Jon: “Expected spin: ‘Obama didn't lose this debate to Romney, he just lead
from behind.’”
Jim Pethokoukis: “Romney's command of detail
really showed on the small biz stuff. Knew both the sides of the argument
cold.”
Matt Cover: “So, looks like Eastwood wasn't so
crazy after all. #emptychair”
Biased Girl: “Barack Obama was exposed
tonight.”
Jonah: “Romney should FedEx some apples to
1600 Pennsylvania Ave with a note, ‘How do you like these?’”
Iowahawk: “That faint sound? Millions of faded
Obama posters coming down.”
The Right Dame: “This isn't breaking news to
us, but to the rest of you who seem so confused, this is the result of an inept
media. You didn’t know either man.”
Ross Douthat: “Sweet spot for GOP politicians:
Center-right not hard right on substance, but w/strong attack lines against
liberalism. Romney hit it.”
Patrick Ruffini: “The broader problem for
Obama that surfaced tonight: He's acting like a liberal ideologue running
against a pragmatic problem-solver.”
Kevin Eder: “Obama looked very tired. I'd be
too if I spent all my time in partying in Vegas, chatting with Letterman, &
livin' it up with Jay-Z. #buried”
AG_Conservative: “Liberals have been told for
months that Romney has no specifics. No wonder they were shocked when Romney
was the only one who did.”
Mary Katharine Ham: “I had no idea the 20th
anniversary was the Embarrassing Capitulation Anniversary.”
Mark
Hemingway: “That wasn't a debate so much as Mitt Romney just took Obama for a
cross country drive strapped to the roof of his car.”
It
will be interesting to see how the Obama campaign responds to this. Some new
document dump? Surrogates playing the religion card more explicitly?
Josh Trevino: “Chance of unilateral US action
in Libya in the coming fourteen days just went up by seventy thousand percent.”
How
would you like to be Vice President Joe Biden right now? He already thinks he’s
God’s gift to audiences, and in his one debate with Sarah Palin, he described
some alternate-universe history that almost no one in the press called him out
on, because of the ongoing Palin obsession at the moment. Michael Totten wrote:
“When
we kicked -- along with France, we
kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon, I said and Barack said, “Move
NATO forces in there. Fill the vacuum, because if you don’t know -- if you
don’t, Hezbollah will control it.” Now what’s happened? Hezbollah is a
legitimate part of the government in the country immediately to the north of
Israel.” [Emphasis added.]
What on Earth is he talking about? The United States and
France may have kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon in an alternate universe, but
nothing even remotely like that ever happened in this one.
That
night Palin turned in a pretty solid performance, but she wasn’t prepared to
fact-check Biden on the spot when he started telling tales about Middle East
policy that sounded like they might be based on classified briefings or
something. Yet if Biden starts rambling a week from now, and starts offering BS
stories that sound good but that do not match any known facts at all, it’s easy
to picture Paul Ryan staring at him, incredulous, and saying simply, “Mister
Vice President, with all due respect . . . what in God’s name are you talking
about?”
I
want Joe Biden swinging for the fences a week from now, feeling like he has to
turn the ship around all by himself.
ADDENDUM:
Toby Harnden: “Jim Lehrer telling Denver
audience that "absolute silence" is required: ‘If you hear something
you don't like -- sit on it!’”
Who
is he, The Fonz?
To read more, visit www.nationalreview.com
National
Review, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment